Nepal’s corrupted and incompetent government has been kicked out by it’s nationals. Especially, Nepal’s government had deep anf very good relation with China CCP, and now, Nepal protester’s anger moves to China CCP. they burn China flag and Xi jinping photo on the street blaming China’s CCP ruined their mother country by China style’s corruption and brainwashing to people.
Among the third World, Whenever new government has been corrupted and try to brainwashing it’s nationals, there is a China CCP behind of it’s government. 在第三世界，每当新政府腐败并试图给国民洗脑时，背后总有一个中国共产党在支持。
新冠病毒仍然在这里，但疫情在很大程度上被认为早已过去。 然而，美国众议院能源和商业委员会刚刚发布了一份新报告，概述了中国如何几周来推迟发布有关该病毒的关键遗传信息，可能推迟了疫苗的发布。 Veuer的Tony Spitz有细节。 查看更多关于视频、生命科学、遗传学、科学、中国、自然科学的视频。 —在flipboard.com/video/veuer/2e8b9f7bbf上阅读 COVID is still very much here, but the pandemic is largely considered long over. However a U.S. House Energy & Commerce Committee has just released a new report, outlining how China delayed releasing crucial genetic information about the virus for weeks, possibly delaying a vaccine. Veuer’s Tony Spitz has the details.. See more videos about Videos, Life Sciences, Genetics, Science, China, Natural Sciences.
— Read on flipboard.com/video/veuer/2e8b9f7bbf
在2020年初，当新冠肺炎仍然是一种神秘疾病时，中国疾病控制中心（CDC）从市场采集了样本。这些样本中包含的遗传信息直到最近才被简短地公开，这使一组研究人员能够解码它们，并将浣熊狗作为可能的“中间宿主”，疾病从中蔓延到人身上。根据3月20日在线发布的一项分析，这项分析的关键是，正在出售的野生哺乳动物浣熊狗的DNA生活在肉类市场上，与SARS CoV-2检测呈阳性的拭子在同一个位置被发现。—阅读www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-65067264 During the early days of 2020, when Covid was still a mystery disease, the Chinese Centers for Disease Control (CDC) took samples from the market. The genetic information contained in those samples has only recently been made, briefly, public, and that enabled a team of researchers to decode them and point to racoon dogs as a possible “intermediate host” from which the disease spilled over into people. The crux of this analysis is that DNA from racoon dogs, wild mammals that were being sold live in the market for meat, was found in the same locations as swabs from the market that tested positive for SARS CoV-2, according to an analysis that was published online on 20 March. — Read on www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-65067264
Does this answer the question of how the pandemic started?
This is not definitive proof. That is something we might never have.
The search for that proof has itself become heavily politicised and often toxic. While this lends weight to the theory that the virus emerged in wild animals and spread to humans at the market, another theory has focused on a possible “lab leak” of a virus from Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The years-long delay in releasing this valuable data has led to frustration and anger with the China CDC.
“The data are three years old – it’s an absolute scandal that it’s taken this long for it to see the light of day,” said Prof Holmes.
The information had actually been posted onto the GISAID genetic database back in February 2022. But it was left there unnoticed. It’s assumed that this was done to provide supporting evidence for a research paper based on the data that was being prepared by Chinese researchers from the CDC. (Sharing such background data is considered a requirement for scientific publication.)
But shortly after the Chinese researchers learned that others had seen the information, it became hidden again.
In a press conference on 17 March, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO) said that “every piece of data” was important in moving us closer to that answer. “And every piece of data relating to studying the origins of Covid-19 needs to be shared with the international community immediately.”
THE EARLY phase of the coronavirus outbreak in China remains an important and still poorly understood lacuna. Prompt, early action could have saved lives and averted enormous disruption. Instead, the Chinese people were exposed to danger in the first weeks of the epidemic when their officials failed to sound the alarm, even though they knew something was afoot.
China is in a ‘lot more trouble than anybody ever wants to imagine’
https://flip.it/5VNCAL
“Yes, they are aggressive, and they could actually stumble into something they don’t want to, but right now, I wouldn’t worry about them too much, but I think Xi’s looking over his shoulders,” Professor Siracusa told Sky News Australia. “是的，他们很有侵略性，他们实际上可能会陷入他们不想做的事情，但现在，我不会太担心他们，但我认为习近平正在注意他的肩膀，”锡拉库萨教授告诉天空新闻 澳大利亚。
What these leaders most detest, as evidenced by Xi’s videotaped temper tantrum with Trudeau, is transparency. We should be working hard to ensure they have to publicly face more of those inconvenient truths.
